Obamas buying Hawaii mansion, planning to move in January--and other rumors
Sep 04, 2012
Here in Chicago, it’s pretty obvious that Michelle does not want to move back to this city and its winters (for any reason) and Michelle’s mother, who’s been living in the White House with her daughter and her family, will be happily making the move to Hawaii as well.
I have a friend whose family knows Michelle’s mother; they have been crystal clear that the elderly Mrs. Robinson regularly says that she’ll be in Hawaii next year permanently with her daughter and granddaughters. There is neither talk of returning to Chicago to live nor of living in the White House for another four years — instead, there’s a sense of “it was fun while it lasted” coming from Mrs. Robinson in her talks with her Chicago friends.
Democrats are already working to locate an acceptable property in Hawaii for the Obamas to live; this land and its complex of buildings must be ready to move-into in January and must meet all the requirements the Secret Service demands since the Obamas will be granted continued protection, by law, for nine years after Barack leaves office. The Reagans, Clintons, and second Bush family all had their post-presidential homes purchased quietly on the side by friends when their times in office were coming to an end. The Obamas are doing the same thing now.
If this is true, then it signals that maybe President Obama knows that the real powers of Babylon have decided upon Mitt Romney as their newly chosen one.
There are also rumblings that we may be surprised by some unexpected events that would change everything. Some are saying that Ron Paul will run as an independent candidate. Certainly, the dubious manipulations of the RNC officials have made many of Paul's delegates very angry. In fact, many of Santorum's delegates were also very angry with Romney and intended to vote for Ron Paul at the convention if given opportunity. (So says one of Santorum's delegates.) Ron Paul himself was denied any coverage at all at the convention and was not allowed to speak--because, as the news reported, he refused to give unqualified support to Romney.
So perhaps the rumblings will die down, or they might increase in a revolt among Republicans. It is something to watch.
Meanwhile, Drake is reporting arrests have started with Nancy Pelosi.
Again, I have no way of verifying this unless it hits the mainstream media. He says that Ron Paul's lawyers intend to break up the club that controls the RNC because of their "illegal actions" at the recent convention.
Keep your ears open, but be cautious about what you hear. I have no doubt that there is much going on behind the scenes that does not get reported, but until it comes out into the open, these things should be treated as rumors that need verification. Keep in mind also that many political leaders (and ALL of the top leaders) have doubles, or look-alikes, who can stand in for them when they take secret trips overseas or go on secret vacations.
Thirty years ago, after Reagan was shot, the news media gave a full report on television, telling us how Reagan's double always walked around ahead of Reagan himself in order to "draw fire" from any potential assassin. And who can forget Saddam Hussein's four doubles and the fact that they had to verify it when they caught the real Hussein? This was all reported on mainstream media.
These things are not normally reported, however, because they don't want to compromise "security." But this practice is done world wide. I have noticed often that when the underground media reports that the president or some other important politician is in a foreign country, the media is careful to report that he is still here in America. Can he be in two places at once? Yes, he can, if he has doubles. But this is often a source of confusion to many people, because the media has used those doubles to discredit reports from the unconventional media.
I do not know if Nancy Pelosi has a double or not, but I think it is very likely she does. Hence, any public appearance might be real, or it might be an attempt to discredit Drake's report of her arrest.
These are reports that you should be aware of, not because they are absolutely true, but because this is what people are saying which may prove to be true. If you read these things with that in mind, you can treat such reports as a first witness which would need confirmation to be believed. Or perhaps a third witness. And make sure the second or third witness isn't just quoting from the first one.
Dr. Stephen Jones